Providing a Structured Way of Viewing and Defining an Enterprise with No Magic
The Zachman Framework is a formal and highly structured way of viewing and defining an enterprise from different perspectives. It is represented as a classification schema for artifacts that is used for enterprise architecture modeling. In order to meet this vision, No Magic has developed and introduces for MagicDraw users a new free Zachman Framework plugin which provides:
The framework represents the interaction between aspects and perspectives. Six rows represent six perspectives and six columns represent six different aspects.
In the figure, you can see the Zachman Framework two-dimensional schema as it is represented in the Zachman Framework plugin for MagicDraw.
This perspective is a planning level. Business context planners describes what, how, where, who, when, and how should be done.
During this phase, six scope identification lists should be prepared, each for the six different aspects.
Scope contexts describe a scope of models, architectures, and descriptions for the organization.
This perspective also describes what planners should consider when thinking about the organization and how it interacts with the world.
Business Context Owners
In this perspective, the business concept model should be created.
Business concepts describe models, architectures, and descriptions that are used by owners of the business process.
A focus of this perspective is on the usage of products.
Business Logic Developers
In this perspective, the system logic model should be created.
System logic describes models, architectures, and descriptions that are used by designers, engineers, and architects who are searching for a compromise between what is desirable and what is technically possible.
Business Physics Builders
In this perspective, the technology physics model should be created.
Technology physics describes models, architectures, and descriptions that are used to design and create an actual project.
The main focus here is on constraints and what will actually be constructed.
Business Component Implementors
In this perspective, the tool concept model should be created.
Tool components describe particular elements or element parts that are included in the final product (for example, software components, documentation, and so on).
Business Component Implementors
The perspective of the Operations instances have no detailed description as it is the physical representation of the model defined in the previous perspectives.
This perspective shows the goal of the model. You do not have to define any model in this perspective. Every step of this perspective represents a particular resource (real person, building, program, and so on).
My team is trying to run Cameo in “batch mode”, and I have a question regarding the FlexNet license server configuration that is not answered in any of the documentation that I was able to find. In the Cameo documentation, I see Java arguments for specifying a FlexNet server and port (FL_SERVER_ADDRESS / FL_SERVER_PORT), and I also see that I can specify a tool edition (FL_EDITION). However, in th
CATIA MBSE CYBER SYSTEMS
Requirement derivation tables are easily one of the top requested topics from users across the industry. In my latest video, I walk through how to define a reusable view def and map it directly to your requirement structures.Watch the Video here: [Link to YouTube Video] Download / Copy the Source CodeGrab the SysML v2 code used in the video below to test and adapt for your own models:How are you
CATIA MBSE CYBER SYSTEMS
Hello,I was able to create a server side simulation using an instance table. There is one part of the simulation that is not working. I have a script that executes as part of a rollup pattern that performs a simple table lookup that fails.The rollup pattern uses a constraint block that has a Groovy script that performs the lookup. The simulation works just fine when executed within Cameo.Here is a
CATIA MBSE CYBER SYSTEMS
I have a table that shows the concerns in a specific part. In that table I want to add a column that shows the requirement(s) that satisfy each concern. The satisfy relations that provide this are contained within the associated requirements and target the specific concerns. The issue I am having is that I am unsure how to pull that information.SysML v2 SysMLv2
CATIA MBSE CYBER SYSTEMS
NOTE: Existing users of No Magic products can access to the user portal at https://magicdraw.com/main.php, as well as Cameo Collaborator for Teamwork Cloud samples at https://ccexamples.nomagic.com.
Speak with a CATIA expert to learn how our solutions enable seamless collaboration and sustainable innovation at organizations of every size.
Courses and classes are available for students, academia, professionals and companies. Find the right CATIA training for you.
Find information on software & hardware certification, software downloads, user documentation, support contact and services offering
